Safety note: Admin approval is an initial review, not a guarantee that every detail is correct. Check important or urgent claims with official sources and report anything inaccurate or unsafe.
Source and credit: Contributor's own report
Pauline Hanson loses appeal over Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination case - Sydney, NSW
Smart summary
The Federal Court has dismissed Pauline Hanson’s appeal against a ruling that found she breached Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act in comments directed at Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi.
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has lost her appeal against a Federal Court decision that found she racially discriminated against Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi over a social media post made in 2022.
The Full Court of the Federal Court rejected Hanson’s challenge and upheld the earlier finding that her post breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which deals with public acts that are reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate people because of their race, colour, or national or ethnic origin.
The case began after Hanson responded to a post by Senator Faruqi following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September 2022. Faruqi had criticised aspects of the British monarchy and its colonial history. Hanson replied with comments telling Faruqi to return to Pakistan, which led Faruqi to begin legal action.
In the original Federal Court decision, Justice Angus Stewart found Hanson’s comments were a form of racial vilification and were directed at Faruqi’s background and identity. The court previously ordered Hanson to delete the post and pay Faruqi’s legal costs.
During the appeal, Hanson argued that the ruling placed unreasonable limits on political expression and freedom of speech. Her legal team argued the comments should be considered within the context of public debate and political discussion.
However, the appeal judges disagreed and confirmed the original decision. The court found that the comments went beyond ordinary political criticism and crossed the legal threshold for racial discrimination.
Senator Mehreen Faruqi attended the appeal judgment and described the outcome as significant for people who experience racism and discrimination. She said the decision showed that public figures can be held accountable for harmful comments.
The case has become part of a broader national debate in Australia about the balance between freedom of speech and protection from racial abuse. Supporters of stronger anti-discrimination laws argue that public comments targeting people because of their identity can cause real harm, while critics have raised concerns about how such laws affect political debate.
The decision also adds to ongoing public discussion around Hanson’s political career and comments on immigration, multiculturalism and Australian identity. Hanson has remained a controversial figure in Australian politics for decades due to her positions on race, migration and national culture.
Legal experts say the judgment reinforces the importance of understanding the limits of public speech under Australian discrimination laws, particularly when comments are directed at individuals because of their racial or cultural background.
The outcome is expected to continue discussions about how Australia manages online speech, political debate and protections against racial discrimination.
HansonFaruqiCommentsRacialCourt
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has lost her appeal against a Federal Court decision that found she racially discriminated against Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi over a social media post made in 2022.
The Full Court of the Federal Court rejected Hanson’s challenge and upheld the earlier finding that her post breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which deals with public acts that are reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate people because of their race, colour, or national or ethnic origin.
The case began after Hanson responded to a post by Senator Faruqi following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September 2022. Faruqi had criticised aspects of the British monarchy and its colonial history. Hanson replied with comments telling Faruqi to return to Pakistan, which led Faruqi to begin legal action.
In the original Federal Court decision, Justice Angus Stewart found Hanson’s comments were a form of racial vilification and were directed at Faruqi’s background and identity. The court previously ordered Hanson to delete the post and pay Faruqi’s legal costs.
During the appeal, Hanson argued that the ruling placed unreasonable limits on political expression and freedom of speech. Her legal team argued the comments should be considered within the context of public debate and political discussion.
However, the appeal judges disagreed and confirmed the original decision. The court found that the comments went beyond ordinary political criticism and crossed the legal threshold for racial discrimination.
Senator Mehreen Faruqi attended the appeal judgment and described the outcome as significant for people who experience racism and discrimination. She said the decision showed that public figures can be held accountable for harmful comments.
The case has become part of a broader national debate in Australia about the balance between freedom of speech and protection from racial abuse. Supporters of stronger anti-discrimination laws argue that public comments targeting people because of their identity can cause real harm, while critics have raised concerns about how such laws affect political debate.
The decision also adds to ongoing public discussion around Hanson’s political career and comments on immigration, multiculturalism and Australian identity. Hanson has remained a controversial figure in Australian politics for decades due to her positions on race, migration and national culture.
Legal experts say the judgment reinforces the importance of understanding the limits of public speech under Australian discrimination laws, particularly when comments are directed at individuals because of their racial or cultural background.
The outcome is expected to continue discussions about how Australia manages online speech, political debate and protections against racial discrimination.
The Federal Government is preparing new measures targeting temporary visas, visa overstayers, international students and visa-hopping, while maintaining...
One Nation’s proposed major reduction in migration has triggered warnings that a sharp cut to population growth could weaken Australia’s economy and cre...
A 36-year-old man has been charged after investigators allegedly found fraudulent identification documents, cloned number plates, cash and drug-manufact...
A Sydney court has heard that a man sent 249 messages to a former partner within 24 hours, with the messages treated as a single alleged breach of an ap...
A high-profile athlete has returned to court and told the hearing that an alleged unwanted kiss by former broadcaster Alan Jones remained difficult to f...
Work on the $150 million Sydney Town Hall Square project has been paused after the NSW Planning Minister referred the development for review by the Inde...
Cairns Regional Council has unanimously voted to seek $400,000 in Queensland Government funding for a program designed to connect local businesses with the region’s growing film...
An automated external defibrillator and memorial plaque have been installed at Ellery Creek Big Hole following the death of disability advocate Ellen Fr...
Queensland firefighters spent several hours monitoring a significant grass fire at Mary Kinross Park in Bargara, near Bundaberg, after the blaze broke out on Wednesday evening....
