The number of dogs euthanased by the Sunshine Coast Council has risen sharply following changes to Queensland's dangerous dog laws, sparking debate among veterinarians, pet owners and animal welfare advocates.

New figures obtained through a Right to Information (RTI) request reveal that the council euthanased 101 dogs during 2025, compared with 32 dogs in the year before the legislation was introduced. The increase began shortly after amendments to Queensland's Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act came into effect in 2024.

According to the council, the rise reflects new legal requirements designed to improve public safety after a number of high-profile dog attacks across the state.

Under the updated laws, a dog that has already been declared dangerous, menacing or restricted must be euthanased if it is involved in another serious attack. Previously, councils had greater discretion when determining outcomes for regulated dogs.

The Sunshine Coast Council said euthanasia is "always a last resort", but emphasised that local governments are legally required to comply with the strengthened provisions.

Data from the RTI request showed that among the 82 dogs euthanased during the 2024–25 financial year, three cases were directly linked to attacks, while others were attributed to failed temperament assessments, aggressive behaviour or existing regulated dog classifications. Four dogs were euthanased due to health reasons.

The issue has become deeply personal for some residents.

Sunshine Coast dog owner Kara Chaplin shared her experience after her dog, Sarge, was euthanased in 2019 following multiple incidents involving other animals. Although Sarge's case occurred before the recent legal changes, Chaplin said she worries that stricter legislation could leave less room for authorities to consider individual circumstances.

Veterinary behaviour specialist Dr Cam Day described the increase in euthanasia numbers as concerning and stressed the importance of transparent reporting around both dog attacks and enforcement actions.

He noted that many incidents involving dogs are not necessarily the result of inherent aggression but can stem from factors such as inadequate supervision, accidental escapes or fear-based responses. Dr Day argued that responsible ownership, training and education remain essential components of preventing attacks.

Professor Amanda Kennedy, an expert in animal management law from Queensland University of Technology, said the legislative changes had significantly reduced councils' ability to exercise discretion in the most serious cases.

"Where a regulated dog seriously attacks again, destruction is now legally mandated rather than a matter of judgement," she said.

The Department of Primary Industries defended the reforms, stating they were intended to strengthen the management of regulated dogs and minimise risks to community safety. Responsibility for enforcing the legislation rests primarily with local councils.

Comparisons with other Queensland regions illustrate the complexity of the issue. Despite having a smaller population than Brisbane, the Sunshine Coast recorded 309 reported dog attacks and 101 euthanasias in 2025, while Brisbane reported more than 1,400 attacks and 88 euthanasias over the same period.

The figures have renewed discussion about balancing public safety, animal welfare and responsible pet ownership.

For many families, pets are beloved members of the household. Yet authorities argue that protecting communities from repeated serious attacks must remain the overriding priority.

As Queensland continues monitoring the impact of its legislative reforms, experts say prevention through education, early intervention and responsible ownership will be key to reducing future tragedies involving both people and animals.