Tik Tok and You Tube Face Royal Commission Over Online Antisemitism
By Neha Maurya · Published 07 Jul 2026 · Updated 07 Jul 2026
Canberra, ACT · ACT News
Safety note: Admin approval is an initial review, not a guarantee that every detail is correct. Check important or urgent claims with official sources and report anything inaccurate or unsafe.
Source and credit: Contributor's own report
Tik Tok and You Tube Face Royal Commission Over Online Antisemitism - Canberra, ACT
Smart summary
Tik Tok and You Tube have appeared before Australia's Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, outlining how they detect and remove hateful content as the inquiry examines the role of social media platf...
Global social media platforms Tik Tok and You Tube have appeared before Australia's Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, where executives were questioned about how their platforms identify, moderate, and remove antisemitic and other hateful content.
The commission is investigating the spread of online hate in Australia and examining whether technology companies are doing enough to prevent harmful material from reaching users. The hearings follow evidence presented over recent months that antisemitic content has increased on several online platforms since late 2023.
Tik Tok's Global Head of Policy, Trust and Safety, Zachary Hecht, travelled from the United States to give evidence. He told the commission that Tik Tok relies heavily on artificial intelligence and automated moderation systems to review content as it is uploaded.
According to Tik Tok, around 98 per cent of harmful content detected in Australia during the first quarter of 2026 was removed before it was viewed by users. The company said its systems automatically assess uploaded videos against community guidelines and prohibit material including Holocaust denial, hateful conspiracies targeting Jewish people, incitement to violence, and other forms of antisemitic abuse.
Commission lawyers, however, questioned whether automated systems always perform effectively. During the hearing, examples were presented where content initially identified by artificial intelligence was later reinstated by human moderators following appeals before eventually being removed after further review. Tik Tok acknowledged that human moderation errors can occur despite extensive automated screening.
Following Tik Tok's appearance, representatives from You Tube, owned by Google, were also scheduled to provide evidence regarding the platform's moderation practices, recommendation algorithms, and enforcement of policies relating to hate speech and extremist content. The commission is examining how recommendation systems may amplify harmful material and what additional safeguards platforms can implement.
The hearings form part of a broader national inquiry into antisemitism and social cohesion established by the Australian Government. Throughout the inquiry, community organisations, academics, regulators, and technology companies have been asked to explain how online hate develops, spreads, and affects Australian communities.
The commission has also heard calls for stronger regulation of social media companies, greater transparency in moderation decisions, and improved cooperation between digital platforms, governments, and law enforcement agencies. Witnesses have argued that while artificial intelligence has significantly improved the detection of harmful content, human oversight remains essential when reviewing complex or context-dependent material.
The inquiry is expected to continue hearing evidence from major technology companies before making recommendations later this year on how Australia can better address online hate while balancing freedom of expression and digital safety.
CommissionContentOnlinePlatformsCompanies
Global social media platforms Tik Tok and You Tube have appeared before Australia's Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion, where executives were questioned about how their platforms identify, moderate, and remove antisemitic and other hateful content.
The commission is investigating the spread of online hate in Australia and examining whether technology companies are doing enough to prevent harmful material from reaching users. The hearings follow evidence presented over recent months that antisemitic content has increased on several online platforms since late 2023.
Tik Tok's Global Head of Policy, Trust and Safety, Zachary Hecht, travelled from the United States to give evidence. He told the commission that Tik Tok relies heavily on artificial intelligence and automated moderation systems to review content as it is uploaded.
According to Tik Tok, around 98 per cent of harmful content detected in Australia during the first quarter of 2026 was removed before it was viewed by users. The company said its systems automatically assess uploaded videos against community guidelines and prohibit material including Holocaust denial, hateful conspiracies targeting Jewish people, incitement to violence, and other forms of antisemitic abuse.
Commission lawyers, however, questioned whether automated systems always perform effectively. During the hearing, examples were presented where content initially identified by artificial intelligence was later reinstated by human moderators following appeals before eventually being removed after further review. Tik Tok acknowledged that human moderation errors can occur despite extensive automated screening.
Following Tik Tok's appearance, representatives from You Tube, owned by Google, were also scheduled to provide evidence regarding the platform's moderation practices, recommendation algorithms, and enforcement of policies relating to hate speech and extremist content. The commission is examining how recommendation systems may amplify harmful material and what additional safeguards platforms can implement.
The hearings form part of a broader national inquiry into antisemitism and social cohesion established by the Australian Government. Throughout the inquiry, community organisations, academics, regulators, and technology companies have been asked to explain how online hate develops, spreads, and affects Australian communities.
The commission has also heard calls for stronger regulation of social media companies, greater transparency in moderation decisions, and improved cooperation between digital platforms, governments, and law enforcement agencies. Witnesses have argued that while artificial intelligence has significantly improved the detection of harmful content, human oversight remains essential when reviewing complex or context-dependent material.
The inquiry is expected to continue hearing evidence from major technology companies before making recommendations later this year on how Australia can better address online hate while balancing freedom of expression and digital safety.
A Queensland government department has lost approximately $800,000 in a cyberattack, prompting a review that found no government data or sensitive infor...
New evidence indicates autonomous Open AI agents attempted to access information from several Australian government and public-sector websites, expanding...
A new Cooperative Research Centre based at the University of Queensland's Brisbane city campus will bring researchers, industry and government together...
Residents in Gisborne South can now access improved mobile phone coverage after a new Telstra tower was installed at I R Robertson Reserve following yea...
Australia has signed a new agreement with Vanuatu to support its renewable energy transition, alongside a $7.29 million regional package aimed at improv...
A 36-year-old man from Kambah has been charged with drug trafficking and multiple prohibited weapons offences after ACT Policing searched his home as pa...
The ACT will begin the first phase of the Thriving Kids program on October 1, providing developmental support pathways for children while concerns remai...
The Reserve Bank of Australia has increased the cash rate by 25 basis points to 4.6 per cent, while the federal government and opposition debate the cau...