A 1920s-era cottage in Trevallyn, near Launceston, is set to be demolished after a community effort to save and relocate the building failed to secure a suitable buyer or relocation proposal.

The cottage, located at 62 Gorge Road, Trevallyn, is owned by the City of Launceston Council and had been identified as having historical significance. The council originally planned demolition because of the building’s deteriorating condition, but a relocation process was launched after concerns were raised about losing a heritage property.

Councillor Tim Walker pushed for an expression of interest (EOI) process to give community members or organisations the opportunity to remove and reuse the cottage. Under the proposal, any successful applicant would have been responsible for relocation costs, approvals and restoring the site after removal.

However, the EOI process did not result in any formal relocation applications, meaning demolition will now proceed. The delay caused by the rescue attempt contributed to an increase in the demolition cost from an earlier estimate of about $64,000 to approximately $80,000.

Council documents indicated that additional costs were linked to several factors, including extending the EOI period, scheduling work during school holiday periods, traffic management requirements and extra salvage considerations.

Councillor Walker said he did not regret attempting to save the cottage and criticised the council’s handling of the property. He argued that more could have been done earlier to preserve a building that had already been recognised as having heritage value.

He questioned why demolition funds could not have been redirected towards helping relocate the cottage, saying the outcome represented a missed opportunity to preserve part of Trevallyn’s history.

The council has defended its position, saying demolition had always been the planned outcome because of the poor condition of the structure. Officials said the building had suffered significant deterioration, including mould, fungal damage, rotten timber, water damage, fire damage and rodent issues.

The council estimated that renovating the cottage could have cost around $400,000, making restoration financially challenging compared with demolition.

The debate has highlighted broader questions around heritage protection in regional Tasmania. Some community members have raised concerns about the loss of older buildings with historical value, while councils must also consider safety risks, maintenance costs and financial responsibilities when managing ageing properties.

The Trevallyn cottage is not the only heritage-related demolition issue to attract attention in Launceston. Critics have argued that more proactive heritage protection measures may be needed to prevent historically significant buildings from reaching a condition where demolition becomes the only practical option.

Supporters of the council’s decision say preserving every old building is not always possible when structures become unsafe or require significant investment. They argue councils must balance heritage interests with responsible use of public funds.

The demolition is expected to bring an end to months of debate over the cottage’s future, leaving questions about how similar heritage properties will be managed across Tasmania in the years ahead.