Victoria Police have ended their investigation into former Melbourne gynaecologist Simon Gordon, who had been referred to police earlier this year following allegations that he performed unnecessary surgeries on women. The investigation attracted significant attention because of the serious nature of the allegations and the number of patients involved.

Gordon was referred to police in February 2026 by then-Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan after concerns were raised about medical procedures he had performed. The allegations centred on claims that some women underwent surgeries that were not medically necessary. The case prompted scrutiny of the treatment patients received and the processes used to assess surgical decisions.

Police investigated the allegations and considered information provided by patients and other sources. Following the investigation, authorities have now decided to end the criminal investigation. The decision means police will not proceed with criminal charges arising from the matters examined during the investigation.

The conclusion of the police investigation does not necessarily resolve all questions surrounding the medical treatment provided to former patients. Medical and professional complaints can involve processes separate from criminal investigations, including regulatory or disciplinary reviews.

The allegations had caused concern among women who had undergone procedures under Gordon's care. For patients who believe they may have received unnecessary treatment, questions about the medical justification for individual procedures can remain important even when a police investigation does not result in criminal charges.

The case also highlights the different standards that apply to criminal investigations and professional medical regulation. Police must determine whether available evidence supports potential criminal offences, while medical regulators can examine whether a practitioner met professional standards and whether patients received appropriate care.

Gordon's case became public after concerns were raised about his surgical practices and the treatment of women who had been patients. The referral to police reflected the seriousness of those concerns and the government's interest in ensuring allegations involving medical practitioners were appropriately examined.

Victoria Police's decision to end the investigation follows months of inquiries. The force's conclusion means the allegations examined during the investigation will not lead to criminal prosecution based on the evidence available to investigators.

For former patients, however, the issue may continue through other avenues. Medical records, independent medical assessments and professional complaints processes can provide different mechanisms for examining whether particular treatments were appropriate.

The case has also contributed to broader discussion about patient safety, informed consent and oversight of medical professionals. Patients undergoing surgery generally rely heavily on doctors to explain why a procedure is recommended, what alternatives exist and what risks are involved.

The police investigation's conclusion is therefore an important development, but it should not be interpreted as a finding that every allegation was proven or disproven. It means police have finished their criminal investigation without proceeding with charges.

The matter remains significant for the women who raised concerns and for the broader medical community as questions about surgical decision-making and patient safeguards continue to receive attention in Victoria.